What DFMs Offer
DFMs devise model investment portfolios, designed to meet the needs of investors with a range of risk appetites, ethical and religious requirements and investment horizons. These are made available to the market through investment platforms, through which advisers and their clients can place investments conforming to those models.
Over time variations in performance mean that the investments made by clients can drift with respect to the model. DFMs periodically rebalance those investments to bring them back in line, but the interactions between DFMs and investment platforms can generate process friction in two areas.
DFMs need Management Information
DFMs need Management Information (MI) about clients invested in their models, including investment performance from platforms to calculate the trades required to affect that rebalancing. There is no consistent presentation of data or process to obtain this MI across multiple advised platforms, generating a significant operational overhead for DFMs.
Calculated Trades
DFMs then need to instruct the trading required by the platform to bring client investments back into line with the model. This is generally done ‘on-platform(s)’ by manually keying calculated trades across client accounts. That can generate risk, and the costs associated with ‘four eyes’ processes to mitigate them.
MPS Standards
How standards-based data integration can help
Providing DFMs with a consistent MI data set will help to streamline the analysis that they need to perform in respect of each platform where their model portfolios are available; and delivering a consistent way of specifying trades that – critically – avoids any need for manual re-keying. This will not only streamline those processes, but also help to manage down the associated operational risks and mitigation costs.
Investment platforms also benefit. Onboarding DFMs who are familiar with an industry-standard approach to managing model portfolios will be easier and less risky for platforms that support them. Moreover, platforms who support industry-standard portfolio management will be more attractive to DFMs, extending the reach of the platform’s proposition.
Both sides will benefit from a less risky operational model and one that is more scalable, inherently reliable and extensible across all trading partners.
Our unique approach to collaboration, refined and proven for over 30 years, delivers solutions that are specified, designed and approved by subject-matter experts from across the industry. This industry expertise is baked into our standards, giving organisations confidence that standards-based integration will be straightforward to deploy with trading partners and are fit for purpose.
How Criterion Standards are used
Criterion Standards come in many forms:
- Standardised wording used across the industry, for example Common Transfer Declarations which are used to facilitate the transfer of pensions between providers.
- Data Standards, across a range of products and processes, which standardise the information shared between trading partners. Criterion supports over 80 different data standards across the life, pensions and investments industry.
- Technical Standards that enable the exchange of data standards using multiple technologies. From CSV files, XML Messaging to OpenAPI & JSON, Criterion Standards support the widest possible range of technologies in the market to ensure the benefits from the use of standards are available to as many organisations as possible.
MPS MI Reporting Standard
- Data Standards for a number of core business reports used by DFMs to manage their models on multiple platforms.
- Accounts newly opened or closed to models
- Accounts with inflight trades or otherwise locked
- AUM by adviser firm
- Inflows and net flows
- Model fees
- AUM by asset
- AUM by account
- Holdings by account, includes;
- Out of tolerance cash position
- Accounts with holdings outside of tolerance
- Asset universe (full and delta)
- Model weightings
- CGT position by account
- Available as CSV templates or as OpenAPI/JSON message standards.
MPS Edit Model and Rebalance Standard
- Data Standards for pre and post model rebalance (OpenAPI/JSON message standards).
- Data and technical standards for edit model, model rebalance and retrieve model (OpenAPI/JSON message standards).
Legal Framework for MPS Standards
- Standardised legal wording to manage the risks and liabilities of implementing data integration between multiple platforms, DFMs and thrid parties.
- Template legal agreement and service schedules.
Standards artefacts
We provide a range of standards artefacts, including business requirements, solutions design, example messages, standards templates, OpenAPIs, JSON message specifications etc. These are available to download from the our website for Standards licence holders.
Organisations can use these artefacts to develop their own integrations based on the Standards with multiple trading partners, who are also Standards licence holders.
Standards management - our Governance services
We actively maintain the Standards, including the management of change requests and future enhancements coming from the standards community, through on-going governance activity.